Not decisive enough?
Was the first fight between Nate Diaz and Conor McGregor not decisive enough? Yes, Nate didn’t have a full camp, McGregor did, but wouldn’t this be more fitting as a rematch if the Irish boxer had eeked past Diaz, or perhaps dominated him? If Nate can basically roll off the couch (no, he was not training for a triathlon) and submit McGregor in two rounds, what’s to say a full camp won’t see an even more dominant showing for the younger Diaz bro?
Of course you can argue that McGregor only had 11 days to adjust to welterweight and also to train for Nate’s specific style, but Diaz mentally broke and finished McGregor, what more needs to be said with the featherweight title begging to be defended?