Joe Lauzon: Decisions Suck - Always Fight For The Finish

Posted on November 27, 2013, 09:01 AM by Mike Drahota
> Cool 19
|
> Poor 4

The scoring system present in mixed martial arts has been under intense scrutiny since UFC 167’s highly controversial main event between Georges St. Pierre and Johny Hendricks. Most close to the sport believe that it is time for change. An open scoring system has been proposed, but as with anything new and untested, there are definite pros and cons.

One thing is certain, though, that the damage done by a fighter must be taken into account. Judging an MMA fight similar to boxing by essentially giving the man who lands the most shots regardless of impact is an outdated practice that is obviously leading to unnecessary conflict and debate.

It’s an interesting discussion with many points and counterpoints. Longtime UFC lightweight Joe Lauzon, who knows a thing or two about not letting it go to the judges, gave his take on the subject to MixedMartialArts.com:

Boxing is very straightforward - you hit the other guy until he can’t stand. How do you score this though…two guys fighting, we will call them Apollo and Rocky.

In one round, Apollo lands a TON of punches and while they are starting to take effect, Rocky stays on his feet. Towards the end of the round, Rocky lands a couple HUGE shots, and wobbles Apollo but he doesn’t go down. Now Rocky was getting beat up for 2:45 of a 3:00 round, but landed those huge shots at the end of the round. Who gets the round? Apollo for controlling and winning most of the round, or Rocky for landing the biggest and best shots of the round. It’s a tough decision, but this is just quality versus volume.

Some will say Apollo won the round and some will say Rocky. Its tough to get the same answer from lots of people though, because it’s subjective and you are comparing apples to oranges.

Now, same thing, Apollo and Rocky fight in an MMA match. Apollo is using his jab and beating up Rocky for most of the round, but towards the end of the round, Rocky shoots a double and works some ground and pound, passes the guard and sinks a read naked choke, but Apollo is saved by the bell. Now you have to compare standup striking and balance that against ground and pound, but also factor in a takedown and a near submission. How many punches did that takedown cancel out? How many did the submission?

Comparing apples to oranges is tough, comparing a grouping of apples, oranges, bananas, pineapples and grapes is even tougher when nothing matches up. Decisions suck. Always fight for the finish, and don’t let someone else have any influence on your winning or losing.

Lauzon, the owner of an amazing 12 Fight Night Bonuses, knows what he’s talking about. He doesn’t always win when he steps into the cage, but he does lay it all on the line every time. His fighting spirit was on full display in his bloody loss to Jim Miller at UFC 155.

But his main strength has always been his fight-ending submissions.

He’s out there to finish or be finished, and while that’s a difficult mantra to take into a fight with the magnitude of St.. Pierre vs. Hendricks, there’s no doubt that MMA as a whole would benefit from this attitude.

What are your thoughts on the continuing debate? Should power punches be rewarded more than volume? How would you implement overarching change in MMA’s currently flawed scoring system?

Outer Photo: Gary A. Vasquez for USA TODAY Sports


Comments

REGISTER OR LOG IN TO POST COMMENTS AND BECOME AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY
  • big dunfey
    Sharp
    4
    Funny | 0
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    Of course decisions ****. But its hard to finish top level fighters. No one will ever be completely happy with judging. But their should be some changes for sure. Maybe more judges and categorize what each one is scoring. Idk. Something has to change tho.

    Reply 5 months ago
  • big dunfey
    Funny
    6
    Sharp | 1
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    Why cant I say the word in ur headline ?????

    Reply 5 months ago
  • Mike Drahota
    Sharp
    4
    Funny | 0
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    Yeah sorry about that. Trying to get cuss words back for us grown men.

    Reply 5 months ago
  • Mike Drahota
    Funny
    2
    Sharp | 0
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    Not that s u c k is a cuss word

    Reply 5 months ago
  • big dunfey
    Funny
    1
    Sharp | 0
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    Right on. Lol thanks man

    Reply 5 months ago
  • MagicMMA
    Funny
    3
    Sharp | 1
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    Im 15, lol

    Reply 5 months ago
  • PukeVomit
    Funny
    2
    Sharp | 0
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    damn that picture - he looks like a necromorph!

    Reply 5 months ago
  • watermelon fresh
    Weak
    2
    Sharp | 1
    Funny | 0
    Cool | 0

    I get it but he makes it sound like he's better in the sense he goes for finish. All fighter really want to finish but not that easy. By the way if anyone needs to reevaluate themselves it's jlo.... Nothing cool about taking the amount of abuse he does to '' entertainment the fans'' he needs improvement

    Reply 5 months ago
  • enjoylife321
    Cool
    Weak
    Sharp
    Funny

    @Mike...if people don't want to see decisions than remove the time limits...That is the only option until one man quits or falls....An open system sounds great but what happens in a three round fight when a guy knows he has won rounds one and two...Whats he going to do in round three....ride out a decision. If we start scoring more for power punches we are still left with some judges confused as to whether it was a power punch, whether it was slightly blocked by the gloves...etc....I just want to see the pi-ss weak takedowns that secure a round axed....Scoring should be based on what follows the takedown....Its not like a takedown is a knockdown...

    Reply 5 months ago