blogkick: Top 5 worst decisions in MMA history

Posted on February 5, 2011, 07:59 PM by bluntsandbeers
> Cool 1
|
> Poor 3

Top 5 Worst Decisions In MMA history:

5. Hatsu Hioki Vs Michihiro Omigawa Sengoku 11

                 For the most part Sengoku fly’s under the radar in the mind of the casual fan, but that does not mean they don’t have their fair share of ghastly decisions. At sengoku 11 Hatsu Hioki and Michihiro Omigawa fought a hard 15 minute battle. The fight wasn’t completely one sided But Omigawa landed takedowns in all three rounds, held dominate positions in two out of three rounds, and out struck Hioki in the first two rounds. Hiokis only significant damage was in the final round where he out boxed Omigawa but still got taken down and held down in the latter parts of the round.

Hioki walks away with a split decision win, robbing a sure victory from one of japans top featherweights in Michihiro Omigawa.

4.  Lyoto Machida Vs Mauricio Shogun Rua I

                Lyoto Machida and Mauricio Shogun met at UFC 104 for the title and the Lyoto’s victory was anything but decisive.

The fight was nowhere near one sided but at the end of the night the victor was clear when a bruised and battered Machida limped around the octagon awaiting to get called for the judge’s decision.  Shogun repeatedly landed hard body kicks and leg kicks that affected Machida throughout every round. Machida was clearly the more damaged fighter and almost all fight simulations counted more significant strikes landed in shoguns favor. When the final verdict was called it was clear the fight was a sham. the boos from the crowd and disapproval of Dana White set the two up for a rematch at UFC 113 where Shogun Rua didn’t give anybody the opportunity to steal the victory by knocking Machida out in the first round.

 

3. Quinton Rampage Jackson Vs Maurillo Rua, Pride 29

Back when Japanese MMA was at its peak, the organization Pride FC put on some great fights. One of those fights was Quinton Rampage Jackson Vs Maruillo Ninja Rua. The fight was very close but Ninja clearly deserved the nod. The first two rounds were very close but Ninja took both rounds due to significant striking, and many submission attempts. The third round was very close but Ninja once again edged Jackson with two takedowns and significant strikes.  With the Pride style of judging Maurillo was clearly the victor due to more aggression, more significant strikes landed, more sub attempts, and more takedowns. But the judges didn’t see it that way as Rampage took home the split decision victory.

 

2. Jake Shields vs Martin Kampman

 Before Brock Lesnar got his faced smashed in by Cain Velasquez, everyone was awaiting the Shields vs. Kampmann fight. Jake Shields was making his UFC debut and his performance was less than spectacular. The first round starts off with Shields scoring a takedown and moving into the mount before getting bucked off to a uneventful end of the round against the fence in the clinch. The 2nd round shields presses the action but gets his TD attempts stuffed by Kampmann. Then Shields goes in for another TD attempt before getting rocked hard in the face by a knee. Kampmann follows Shields to the ground and ends up on bottom, shields passes and gets full mount but gets bucked almost immediately. Big John separates them and Kampmann lands a big right hand to end the round. Round 3 is almost all Kampmann, he stuffs all of shields take downs  and lands many significant strikes in the process. Kampman stuffs a takedown and tries to work a choke as Shields scrambles and shields is able to regain top position before the round ends. Anybody watching this fight realized that Kampmann was more aggressive, did more damage, and went for the finish a lot more then shields, who only landed two takedowns and worked almost no sub attempts. But for some odd reason Jake Shields gains the victory via split decision.

 

  1. 1. Nam Phan vs. Leonard Garcia

When making this list I had no doubt in my mind who was going to be number 1, and Im pretty sure if your reading this you had a hunch that this abomination of decision making was going to top my list. Yes TUF 12 finale where Nam Phan gets absolutely robbed of a three round unanimous decision in his octagon debut. The first round was a little tentative but as the round went on Phan was clearly the more technical & powerful striker. He was landing more shots as the round went on and he finished strong with complex combinations. The 2nd round was spitting image of the first, Phan uses good footwork to avoid the majority of Garcia’s strikes and lands vicious body shots. Garcia landed a few good punches but aside from that he was out struck the entire round. The 3rd round showed a little bit of life for Garcia when he landed a lot more strikes but that still isn’t saying much, Phan stayed composed got his timing back and finished the 3rd off strong with an array of strikes. Clearly Phan won all three rounds and the eruption of boos from the crowd during the decision was deafening. Garcia gets the nod via split decision & blind judging.

Comments

REGISTER OR LOG IN TO POST COMMENTS AND BECOME AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY
  • MMAMINDSET
    Sharp
    8
    Funny | 0
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    i don't know about that Shields vs Kampmann. being worthy. if you ask me it was close but Shields did win 2 rounds. you are right, Kampmann did do more damage, but he wasn't aggressive and he was controlled a lot of the fight.

    Reply 2 years ago
  • Jamie Kennedy
    Funny
    4
    Weak | 1
    Cool | 1
    Sharp | 0

    Title of this article: Cecil Peoples guide to MMA Judging

    Reply 2 years ago
  • evilways
    Sharp
    1
    Funny | 0
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    Ya i curse that name

    Reply 2 years ago
  • griffin
    Sharp
    2
    Weak | 1
    Funny | 0
    Cool | 0

    shields won that fight but kampmann coulda won it. I agree with #1 my mind was completley blown wen they say garcia won

    Reply 2 years ago
  • Ninja
    Sharp
    2
    Weak | 2
    Funny | 0
    Cool | 0

    Ya I thought Shields won too....I would include Garcia vs Korean Zombie, Bas vs Randleman was pretty shocking too and Arona vs Wand II

    Reply 2 years ago
  • mousasi
    Weak
    3
    Sharp | 2
    Funny | 0
    Cool | 0

    Jason Brilz vs Lil Nog should be on this list. Brilz dominated every round and somehow lost a split decision. Shogun vs Machida 1 was a pretty close fight, and Shields pretty clearly won two of the rounds even if he did get dominated in the last round. There is a lot of opinion in this post, and not too much logic. Typical blogkick.

    Reply 2 years ago
  • Joey Santosus
    Cool
    Weak
    Sharp
    Funny

    I agree with u on the Brilz-Nog fight, that was a great upset spoiled by poor judging. Also the Shields-Kampmann fight... Shields won, thats just how MMA judging works.



    As far as ur comment on "a lot of opinion" and "typical blogkick," thats the entire point of BlogKick... They were instructed to write opinion based articles : )

    Reply 2 years ago
  • mousasi
    Cool
    Weak
    Sharp
    Funny

    Maybe "a lot of opinion" wasn't the best choice or words. What I meant was there is an obvious bias against certain fighters, notably Shields and Machida. Those two fights don't even make an objectively written top 20 list let alone a top 5.

    Reply 2 years ago
  • stenzo306
    Sharp
    2
    Funny | 0
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    didn't Omigawa beat Hioki? :S

    Reply 2 years ago
  • Ninja
    Sharp
    1
    Funny | 0
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    He did...Omigawa lost a split to Kanehara and won a split against Hioki

    Reply 2 years ago
  • Rafael_Roberto
    Weak
    3
    Sharp | 2
    Funny | 0
    Cool | 0

    I think Shogun and Machida should be #1 because that was for the title

    Reply 2 years ago
  • GnPGorilla
    Cool
    Weak
    Sharp
    Funny

    Garcia vs Zombie should be up there.



    As far as Machida vs Shogun goes, that fight was closer than many think. In my opinion, the decision could've gone to either of them. The reason why most believe it should've been Shogun as the victor is because he clearly dominated the last two rounds, which made a strong impression in most of the audiences minds after it ended. Even myself, at the time it was live. Thing is, I was in and out of the fight, therefore, I wasn't paying much attention till the later rounds came in. Later, I watched the fight, again, only this time with pure diligence.



    Since they fought for five rounds to a decision, the fight was judged based upon points. When rounds 4 & 5 were CLEARLY Shoguns, it can be argued rounds 1, 2 & 3 were MARGINALLY Machidas. Those were the closest rounds and most difficult to score, could've gone either way. So the decision the judges rendered were indeed based on points, and not most damage. Machida's 3 marginal rounds to Shogun's 2 dominant rounds were the difference. Calling it a robbery is a bunch of hyperbole. An interesting way to look at it would be if it wasn't a title fight, and only 3 rounds, with the same exchanges, there wouldn't be any controversies had Machida remained the victor.



    Go back and watch it with diligence, hit for hit between the two, one could make the argument the early rounds were Machidas, and the fight was very close, and the decision isn't as controversial as its made out to be.

    Reply 2 years ago
  • overhand right
    Sharp
    4
    Weak | 1
    Funny | 0
    Cool | 0

    shields vs kampmann? i know a lot of people, myself included, thought shields won the fight. it was marginal but there's been way worse decisions than that.

    Reply 2 years ago