Why Winning is Everything in MMA
Posted on February 23, 2011, 01:16 PM by codemasterMany fans would question this proposition, claiming that 'entertainment' should be first, and winning a close second. The following explains why winning is always first and always should be first. This is good for the fans, the fighters and the sport of MMA.
MMA is a Sport
MMA is a sport distinct from WWE because there are real fights and real competition. Like any sport, not all competitions are exciting. In football, a team with a killer defensive line, but cursed with poor offense, may win the game, even though the game is low scoring. In baseball, an excellent pitcher may shut down the batting lineup of his opponents, while his own team struggles to rack up one run on the scoreboard. The bottom line is that not all sports competitions are exciting--this is a normal part of sports and life in general.
Survival of the Fittest
In any competitive sport, Darwinian philosophy rules. In nature, no one cares about how exciting a species was, but rather, they remember and pay attention only to those who survive and thrive. This Darwinian imperative is what keeps sports interesting to spectators. Every time a team comes up with a new set of skills, their opposition is forced to learn those skills and counter with their own skills--or face extinction. MMA has evolved so much since the '90s because of this constant battle to tip the balance of power.
Evolution in MMA
When Royce Gracie appeared on the scene with BJJ, he shocked a lot of fans with a set of skills which could submit much larger and more muscular fighters. Due to the novelty of BJJ, most fighters were unprepared and did not know how to counter this deadly skill. They were forced to adapt or perish--so adapt they did. Now, BJJ is considered one of the three broad skill sets required to be successful in MMA, and it is much harder to submit fighters now because they were forced to become experts in this martial art in order to succeed.
Chuck Liddell was one of the fighters who brought striking and excitement back to MMA. Because Liddell had a wrestling background, he stuffed takedowns and popped back to his feet with ease when he was taken down. Everyone remembers Chuck for his striking, but without his takedown defense, he never would have gotten the opportunity for his spectacular KO wins.
In the welter weight division, Matt Hughes was defeating one opponent after another with a forgotten skill--American wrestling. Matt's standup was workmanlike, at best, while his BJJ skills were excellent--but what made the difference was wrestling. Fighters expert in BJJ were helpless against an excellent wrestler who could also defend BJJ submissions. Hughes proved a well-rounded fighter would prevail against such pure BJJ luminaries as Royce Gracie and Renzo Gracie.
Randy Couture was also showing the power of wrestling in MMA competitions, by defeating some of the top names of the time. GSP took this well-rounded approach to the next level by having excellent skills in striking, wrestling and BJJ--and being able to transition between each skill set seamlessly.
Another part of the evolution of MMA is conditioning. Fighters today are better able to go 3 or 5 rounds than they were in the past. The whole culture of conditioning has evolved with the sport of MMA including diet, sleep, and a scientific approach to conditioning and peaking at just the right time.
Competition Makes MMA Better and Better
There are many other examples of the evolution of MMA, but the point is that there IS an evolution. The sport is not in the same place it was ten years ago, because fierce competition has forced every fighter, every training camp to adapt, and become more sophisticated. In the past, the only game plan most fighters brought to the cage was--"I'm gonna hit him 'till he drops". Due to the competitive nature of the sport, this no longer is an option for top fighters. Now, fighters and their training camps analyze and dissect each opponent, working on specific tactics and an overall strategy which will garner the win.
This competition is heartless, caring little for consistent losers. There are fighters who, since they have lost in an exciting fashion, are given some slack and allowed to continue to fight again--but not even the biggest name with the most impressive record can lose forever. Eventually, they are cut or retire because MMA fans will not tolerate consistent losers, no matter how much they like them personally.
This is good for the fans, the fighters, and the sport. Due to this Darwinian evolution, the fans get to see new fights with new skills fought at a more intense level of competition each year. The fighters are forced to evolve physically, mentally and to become more well-rounded fighters engaging fan interest--which translates into more money and rewards for excellence. The sport itself is made better because the level and skill of competition only gets better, and attracts more fans.
MMA Fans Evolve Too
It is important to remember that just as MMA has evolved, fans evolve in their appreciation of MMA. When a fan is first attracted to MMA, often the KO is the most impressive aspect of the sport to interest them. As they watch more fights, they learn and evolve. Many learn to appreciate a back and forth grappling contest or the moves which lead to a slick submission, and overall better appreciate the nuances of every aspect of the fight--not just the finishing move. It is easy for the seasoned MMA fan to recognize which stage in evolution their fellow fans are at by their complaints that a closely fought and brilliant fight was boring because it went to a decision.
At the top level, when fighters are more evenly matched--it is much harder to get the KO or the submission. There is no longer low-hanging fruit ready for easy pickings in the top ten anymore--with a few exceptions. There are still exciting finishes, but there are also closely fought decisions--as each fighter adapts and becomes more highly skilled, conditioned, and savvy.
They know it is win or die.

Comments
Love the article. Great points - especially bringing in the 'Darwinian rules' and tying in the evolution of the sport as well as it fans. Great Job.
@friendlyfoe
Thanks. I thought it was important to highlight how the incentive for winning is what makes the sport truly grow, not the incentive for entertainment. Don't get me wrong--I love entertaining fights, and dramatic finishes--but I believe the incentive to win will produce plenty of exciting finishes as well as make the sport grow.
For example, a mismatch may produce an exciting finish, but it does not really improve the sport. Also, those fighters who forget the 'Art' of martial arts and engage in 'stand and bang' in order to provide more obvious excitement don't contribute to the sport in the long term.
I should also point out that there are some exceptions to the rule of thumb.
Anderson Silva, GSP and Jose Aldo are so far above their competition, that many fights might be categorized as mismatches. This is not the promotion's fault, but is due to the special nature of these fighters. These fighters would never fight if we waited for a 'worthy' opponent, so as fans, we must accept that some fighters are so good, that all their fights might appear to be 'mismatches'.
Winning is everything because you dont wanna end up like Phil Baroni
Just like the Greeks, once they have found how to sculpt a perfect figure they abandoned it just as quick. Why? No flavor, no life. It is embedded into our core. We are not perfect and perfection last very little. It is variety that we seek. Winning for the sake of winning will be a trend but it is all, only a trend. With time we will become bored with technicality, it's the way it has always been. There will be another shift towards reckless abandonment, and then BOOM! another shift towards precision. It is a cycle and will continue.
this article was made for jon fitch. you can make all the points you want but think of it like this, there are fighters like bj penn, anthony pettis, shogun, ect. who actually go in there and fight, take chances and actually consider the fans when they fight, and have produced some great highlights. and then there those fighters like jon fitch, jake shields, nick lentz, ect. who have the wrestling mantality to just win no matter what it takes, and could care less what the fans think, and fans have the right to critisize because were the ones who pay them initialy. if they dont show respect for fans in their fighting style then why should we show respect for them. and im not saying all grappling is boring, george sotiropolous is one of my favourite fighters, but some of these wrestlers are rediculouse (nick lentz). i just cant wait till the future when more fighters start coming from a kickboxing background instaed of wrastling
.
Both Shogun and Pettis fight to win first. You can tell by how they fight--they carefully choose their moments to strike or counter--they do not wade in slinging leather without a care.
You are right, fans have a right to criticize as much as they want--but it will have no affect unless you want to change the fundamental rules of the game--such as ban wrestling--because it is not as exciting as striking--or maybe add a new excitement rule to the judging etc.
I doubt most fans want a WWE fixed fight--to ensure 'excitement'--so practically speaking what do you do? Also, remember, excitement is often in the mind of the beholder. What you find boring, I might find exciting. I like Jon Fitch and I think he is one of the top ten P4P fighters on the planet.
I am actually beginning to enjoy the frustration of you fans who hate Jon Fitch as he keeps winning and winning.
The gnashing of your teeth is music to my ears.
' )