Monsterous Numbers

What is your point? that mean he is unbeatable,oh, wait he did lose...

My point? Its the current statistics of a fighter in an upcoming main-event. Its called contribution. Thanks.

Should do one of Carwin so we can see how they compare b4 the big fight

great post suc.....BUT of coarse his stats are gonna be outrageously positive, he only has 5 fights

Exactly! Thanks OMR, now I don't have to explain it.

Only having a few fights does not mean the stats are higher than they should be. The only thing few fights DOES mean is that there is no way to know how accurate the stats are. For all we know, they could actually be higher than they have been in those 5 fights.



Think of it like this - Lets say you have a 90% hit percentage, in 100 strikes he could have missed his first 10 and hit the next 90, but wouldnt reach the peak of his percentage until the 100th.

If it wasn't for the stoppage, you know he would have won the fight.

Oh and thanks to FightMetric.com for providing the Stats : )

really cool post man!

What are you trying to do, give us a boner or somethin lmao ....interesting though...facts wise.

Nah, I was thinking about doing this more often with different fighters who are main eventing in the coming weeks... Thought I would see how people reacted.

You had to pick Brock hahaha! SUC always stirring the pot!

Lol, well he is the champ! Ya know? I just wrote a damn essay on Fedor what 2 days ago?!

Already. I'm just messing with ya. Good work SUC! Me and Nik want to see Kimbo's numbers please.....

this doesnt say that much because the guy has only had 5 fights and if he gets you down he is so dam big you cant get him off, I think Carwin will dramatically lower those #s

lol 80% of those ground strikes are done on Frank Mir's face. Let's wait until he fight more opponents.

Make another statistic when he gots 10 or more fights please...

Now all you WWE/Dana nuthuggers will have to make room for eachother. UFC Sausagefest!

Ur a moron and u are bad for the sport and this site. Move around. I bet you are "predatory"........on children.

I was watching this sport long before you ever heard of it, go back to your homo male soap opera (aka WWE). YOU are bad for this site and the sport, promoting that the only good fighters that exist in the world are owned by UFC, which is complete bullshit. Sorry, only pedaphiles like you, Vince, Dana and the catholic church would think about children that way. Grow up kid.

Haha, really I need not even reply because when a guy brings up the WWE and starts bashing the UFC, when none of it was mentioned, it immediately shows the extent of that persons knowledge and respect for the sport. You say, "promoting that the only good fighters that exist in the world are owned by UFC." When or where did I say this? I often contribute well thought and non-bias material to this website. Lesnar has an upcoming title fight in the main-event at 116, which makes this a highly relevant post. Its not my fault that you are so emotionally invested in another man. Its ironic how one could be so childish and then reference another as "kid." I refer you to Drago's post down below.



Btw, I have been watching since the first UFC..... Dont "kid" yourself.

lol come on.. is it really fair posting this after 5 fights? 2 of which agianst frank mir which is a clear bad match up for mir, and a old couture and a irrelevant Herring. there is no reason for this post you jackass. this doesnt prove lesnar legitiment, if he dominates carwin i think he sits at the top of the HW heep. now the new arguments gonna be lesnar and overheem..

good god.

Heh, except that Lesnar wouldn't even last as long as Rogers did.

Oh really I am a jackass for posting Brock Lesnar's stats when he has an upcoming title fight u ****ing idiot? Its similar to what is done in a monthly mma magazine and I thought it would be cool for LowKick! What do u contribute to this site loser? A picture of a pot leaf? Blunts and Beers? Ur a ****ing queer!! Get lost, no body thinks ur cool if u smoke a blunt nerd. Ur entitle to ur opinion, but to call someone a jackass for sharing stats?

Ugh really? At least wait till he's at his 8th fight or something to do percentage stats. He needs more fights and more offensive and defensive positions before you can do a credible stat chart.

Nice, but I want you to post his stats again after he has had 14 or 15 fights then we will see where he stands.

Nice post man, dont bother responding to the critics here because they are incoerent and absurd. Post Carwins Stats as well if you have time so we can compare the ground and pound efficiency of Brock against the stand up efficiency of Carwin. Cheers!



PS - For all you "guys" that got upset about a post with statistics, get a life...

I had planned on it... This was a non-bias post, relevant to the upcoming title bout at UFC 116. I really do not feel like troubling myself to do it again due to the lack of appreciation. The most successful MMA magazines do this same thing... Multiple magazines issued for the current months are displaying Brock's statistics....

Yeah, I read the same article in the UFC magazine, touting Lesnars statistics. What's important to remember about his ground game is that it's largely short hammer fists. When some people see stats like this they may think that Lesnar is some super refined, polished and accurate ground striker, when in reality he often throws a hundred very short hammer fists in rapid succession. Hey don't get me wrong - it's proven effective - but these are things to remember, especially when considering the

Exactly, but they are only statistics to do with as u please.