Gegard Mousasi: I want to fight Mike Kyle in February

Posted on January 4, 2011, 04:28 AM by Anton Gurevich
> Cool 12
|
> Poor 4


Comments

REGISTER OR LOG IN TO POST COMMENTS AND BECOME AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY
  • theashark
    Sharp
    4
    Weak | 2
    Funny | 1
    Cool | 0

    **** yeah!

    Reply 2 years ago
  • AlexSayhi
    Weak
    9
    Funny | 7
    Sharp | 4
    Cool | 0

    That's right Gegard, keep on fighting nobodies ! It's great for your legacy, especially when you call out fighters coming off a loss !

    Reply 2 years ago
  • IChokePeople
    Sharp
    14
    Weak | 3
    Funny | 0
    Cool | 0

    Yeah, because fighting a guy who dropped down from HW and almost KOd Big Foot is fighting a nobody. BTW, That was sarcasm.

    Reply 2 years ago
  • Ninja
    Sharp
    6
    Funny | 0
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    They hve been planning this fight for a long time....he called out Kyle when he became the Dream champ only reason Kyle even fought Big Foot was cause he was a last minute replacement

    Reply 2 years ago
  • MAMBA24ILL
    Weak
    4
    Sharp | 2
    Funny | 1
    Cool | 0

    Was his last SF fight really last April? If so the guy learns tons from Fedor.

    But i like the way he always want to fight.

    Reply 2 years ago
  • IChokePeople
    Sharp
    3
    Weak | 2
    Funny | 1
    Cool | 0

    Sounds like a great match-up. With SF just starting out and having pretty small divisions, this fight makes sense. Kyle is a huge LHW with good hands who just came really close to KOing a top 10 HW. I look forward to this fight.

    Reply 2 years ago
  • Wolfi
    Weak
    3
    Sharp | 2
    Funny | 1
    Cool | 0

    Top 10 HW in Strikeforce maybe.

    Reply 2 years ago
  • IChokePeople
    Sharp
    2
    Funny | 0
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    Name more than ten HWs that are better.

    Reply 2 years ago
  • IChokePeople
    Cool
    Weak
    Sharp
    Funny

    I have him at 10.

    Reply 2 years ago
  • postmortem
    Funny
    1
    Sharp | 0
    Weak | 0
    Cool | 0

    name more than ten hw in sf

    Reply 2 years ago
  • overhand right
    Cool
    Weak
    Sharp
    Funny

    i think barnett has the slight edge on him and i have him at ten instead..

    Reply 2 years ago
  • 1wayticket
    Cool
    1
    Weak | 1
    Funny | 0
    Sharp | 0

    DAMN yall .... HATERS GONNA HATE.... i wanted to see this fight ! and i hope it happens .... GO GEGARD ....

    PS make us Armos Pride

    Reply 2 years ago
  • TwA
    Cool
    1
    Weak | 1
    Funny | 0
    Sharp | 0

    GEGARD GONNA DESTROY HIM

    Reply 2 years ago
  • David.K
    Sharp
    1
    Weak | 1
    Funny | 0
    Cool | 0

    I'm sorry, but I still think Gegard is too good for Strikeforce's LHW's

    Reply 2 years ago
  • UrHype
    Cool
    Weak
    Sharp
    Funny

    KingMo ring a bell? I admit I had one foot on the bandwagon before he lost to MoHoe...after that, well.......

    Reply 2 years ago
  • David.K
    Cool
    Weak
    Sharp
    Funny

    I knew sombody would come with this arguement, but I bet you if they fought 10 more times, Gegard would win 9. Besides, even if Kink Mo is better, after that, WHO?

    Reply 2 years ago
  • overhand right
    Cool
    Weak
    Sharp
    Funny

    i think gegard should drop down to mw where he has a size advantage. he got outmuscled and outwrestled in the king mo fight. still a world class striker but i feel he'll always have issues against big wrestlers at 205



    plus that would allow a rematch between him and jacare :D

    Reply 2 years ago
  • TenderRainDrop
    Weak
    1
    Funny | 0
    Sharp | 0
    Cool | 0

    Why? he's been doing great at LHW. He has also talked about going up to HW. He's still young, 25 at 6'1". He's got the frame to bulk up if he needs to. It's probably harder for him to drop to MW anyways. Only reason he got manhandle by Mo is because Mo is a good wrestler and GM isn't. He's been improving his wrestling. He also beat the crap out of Mo from the ground. He's got so much potential it's unthinkable.

    Reply 2 years ago